Skip to main content

Week 5 - Intellectual Standards Part 2

 Depth

1. I understand "depth" to mean providing a deeper meaning of a subject.

 

2. In other words, a statement that goes beyond just a simple explanation. Instead, providing it's purpose and underlying concepts hidden between the lines.

 

3. An example of someone exhibiting depth with social media would be my friend on YouTube talking about a specific book, movie, or video game that she really loves. She will give a brief description of the topic in question, then she will give her own opinions and/or give her own interpretations of the work to her viewers.

 

Breadth


1. I understand "breadth" to mean allowing for interpretations from different points of view.


2. In other words, creating an open discussion on certain topics and subjects. Thus allowing people to voice their own opinions from all perspectives instead of focusing on one insight over all others. 


3. An example of someone exhibiting breadth with social media would be my friend commenting on a Twitter post about a negative comment about her favorite singer. Instead of trying to prove the person wrong in their opinion, my friend would talk about why she loves the singer thus sharing her opinion but not infringing on the critic's own opinions.

 

Logic


1. I understand "logic" to mean making sense, having little to no flaws in reason.


2. In other words, having a rational understanding of the topic as well as making sure there is no room for miscommunications or misinformation. It also helps when providing evidence to back their claims. 


3. An example of someone exhibiting logic with social media would be my friend writing a Facebook post about the importance of recycling in order to reduce your carbon footprint. She would list the different advantages of recycling. At the bottom of the post, she would then post links to different articles that would then help back her arguments up.

 

Significance


1. I understand "significance" to mean the meaning of the topic or statement. 


2. In other words, key elements in any topic having a strong importance and relevancy to the topic or discussion. Some elements having multiple interpretations within the meaning itself while others are pretty straight forward.


3. An example of someone exhibiting significance with social media would be my friend, on Facebook, bringing awareness to the importance of throwing away your trash when you're at the beach or in any public setting. She would then talk about an anecdote about how she would always find trash whenever she would go to the beach. She would then post pictures of the trash she has found/collected after visiting the beach. Thus bringing significance to her topic in the form of personal experience and photographic evidence.

 

Fairness


1. I understand "fairness" to mean a level playing field of interpretations.


2. In other words, being open to differing opinions and not clutching to your own personal biases. Talking about a specific topic without letting your own opinions cloud your judgements and the arguments of other people.  


3. An example of someone exhibiting fairness with social media would be my friend making a YouTube video where she talks about her opinions on a tv show that she isn't/wasn't particularly fond of. She would then encourage people to write in the comments about their opinions on the topic and whether or not they agree with her opinion. This creates fairness by allowing people to voice their own opinions on the topic, as well as having an open discussion amongst others who share your opinions. 

 

Intellectual Standards is the basic guidelines for how to think rationally and logically. These standards are important to help develop your own opinions and coming to your own conclusions, while also having an open mind.

 


The purpose of the assignment is creating a deeper understanding of the remaining five Intellectual Standards, as well as knowing when and where to use them.

 


The key question at the heart of the assignment is of all of the Intellectual Standards (all nine of them) which one (or two) standards do you use most often?


Comments

  1. Your statement had precision with your example for fairness as it was relevant to what you said fairness means, "a level playing field of interpretations." Everyone has their own opinions on topics and we have to be fair to others when they express their own opinions whether they agree or disagree with our own opinions. I really liked your meanings for each standard as well as great examples to go with it.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Your statement had accuracy when you mentioned in significance "In other words, key elements in any topic having a strong importance and relevancy to the topic or discussion. Some elements having multiple interpretations within the meaning itself while others are pretty straight forward." Itʻs important to determine which elements are significant to the topic and using those interpretations. Great job!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. your statement: "In other words, creating an open discussion on certain topics and subjects. Thus allowing people to voice their own opinions from all perspectives instead of focusing on one insight over all others." helps to have a clearer vision and better understand the concept you explain.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 5 - Collaborative Connections

  What is the purpose of a collaborative connection? The purpose of a collaborative connection is to meet people with similar goals and/or interests in order to create bonds to help each other achieve their goals. Collaborative connections, as I interpret it, a community of like-minded people reaching out to others just like themselves on social media and creating bonds and sub-communities. People connecting online and supporting each other in a positive way and thus working together to achieve a common goal. For example, a group of cancer survivors or friends and families of cancer patients can form a sub-community online to connect with each other. Consoling and comforting those in times of great hard-ships, and maybe organizing events to help raise awareness or money for families in dire need. If you decided to make a collaborate connection online what would happen? Ideally, what I would want to happen would be to maybe create a connection online, I would want people to of cours...

Week 4 - Intellectual Standards

INTELLECTUAL STANDARDS Clarity I understand "clarity" to mean to be clear and understandable. In other words, being easy to follow and understand so that the viewers can follow along. You can also achieve clarity by asking questions when something is unclear or can be easily misunderstood. An example of someone exhibiting clarity with social media would be my friend advertising for a fundraiser on Facebook. My friend would then give the details of what the fundraiser is for, when/where it is going to be, and other information. This way everyone will be on the same page and will know what to expect should they wish to participate. Let's also say that I don't know how to get to the location, I would then ask, "How do you get to the fundraiser?" or something like that and my friend will then post detailed directions so that everyone will know how to get there. Accuracy I understand "accuracy" to mean as factually correct as possible. In other wor...

Week 8 - The Art of C&@* Detection

"Almost nothing is about what you think it is about--including you." With the possible exception of those human encounters that Fritz Peris calls "intimacy," all human communications have deeply embedded and profound hidden agendas. Most of the conversation at the top can be assumed to be bullshit of one variety or another. An idealist usually cannot acknowledge his own bullshit, because it is in the nature of his "ism" that he must pretend it does not exist. In fact, I should say that anyone who is devoted to an "ism"--Fascism, Communism, Capital-ism--probably has a seriously defective crap-detector. This is especially true of those devoted to "patriotism." Santha Rama Rau has called patriotism a squalid emotion. I agree. Mainly because I find it hard to escape the conclusion that those most enmeshed in it hear no bullshit whatever in its rhetoric, and as a consequence are extremely dangerous to other people. If you doubt this, I want ...